Skip to content

AI in Medicine: The Challenge of Trusting What We Don’t Fully Understand

In the early days of artificial intelligence, machine learning models were pretty straightforward. We could look at them and understand how they worked. But things have changed. Today, the most powerful AI systems, especially those using deep learning, are almost impossible for us to “see inside.” This has made them incredibly useful for tasks like analyzing medical data, including diagnosing heart conditions through ECG signals. These deep neural networks (DNNs) are impressively accurate but bring a significant challenge: they operate as “black boxes”—producing results without showing us how they got there.

Let’s dig a little deeper into why this is such a big deal, especially in the field of medicine.

The Power and Limits of Black-Box AI

In the world of ECG diagnostics, for example, we expect AI to make sense of data in ways that a skilled cardiologist would. We want these models to analyze heart rhythms and identify abnormalities just as a human expert would. But unlike a cardiologist, the AI doesn’t tell us what it saw in the data or why it made a particular decision. This leaves a huge gap in transparency that makes it hard for medical professionals to trust the technology. After all, in medicine, every decision impacts real lives, and a lack of understanding can lead to hesitation, or worse, errors.

However, there is an interesting twist: some experts think these “black-box” models might reveal patterns in data that humans would miss. So, while we may not fully understand them, these models could potentially unlock medical insights that weren’t previously known.

Explainable AI: Moving Toward More Transparent Decisions

AI experts are now focusing on developing “Explainable AI” (XAI) to make these complex models easier to interpret. XAI aims to provide methods that make AI’s decision-making process clearer, either by creating inherently explainable models or by adding explanations to existing ones. For instance, in medical imaging, techniques like “saliency maps” highlight which parts of an image influenced a model’s decision. Or there’s “LIME,” which tweaks parts of an image to see how the model’s predictions change, giving insights into which features mattered most.

These XAI techniques offer a layer of transparency, and although they don’t always provide a perfect answer, they do help us get a bit closer to understanding AI’s inner workings.

Why Interpretability Matters (and Not Just for Medicine)

When an AI model is easy to interpret, people trust it more. Simple models like linear regression or decision trees are naturally transparent, making them easier for humans to understand. However, they often lack the complexity needed for nuanced tasks like medical diagnostics. With deep learning, we get that complexity and accuracy, but at the cost of interpretability.

The solution isn’t clear-cut. Some researchers argue that in high-stakes fields like healthcare, we should stick with models that are inherently explainable. Others believe that the accuracy of deep learning models justifies their use, even if they are black-boxes. What everyone does agree on, though, is that there’s a growing need for AI that provides both strong performance and an understandable process.

The Ethics and Future of Explainable AI in Medicine

One reason explainability has become such a focus is the ethical side of AI. In healthcare, we can’t afford to be “in the dark.” If AI models are going to assist with diagnoses, patients and doctors have the right to understand their reasoning. This has already influenced some legal and regulatory bodies, such as the European Union, which is pushing for the “right to an explanation” in AI-driven decision-making.

As AI becomes more integrated into clinical practice, being aware of both its potential and its limitations is essential. Transparency can help build trust, prevent errors, and catch biases in these models that might otherwise go unnoticed. While deep learning holds enormous promise, we need to approach it with caution and a clear understanding of its inner workings.

Explainable AI is still evolving, and while it might not be a complete solution to the “black-box” problem, it’s a crucial step toward building trust and making AI a valuable partner in healthcare.

References

  • Bodini, Matteo, Rivolta, Massimo W., and Sassi, Roberto. "Opening the black box: interpretability of machine learning algorithms in electrocardiography." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 379(2212), 20200253, 2021. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0253

  • Barredo Arrieta, Alejandro, Díaz-Rodríguez, Natalia, Del Ser, Javier, Bennetot, Adrien, Tabik, Siham, Barbado, Alberto, Garcia, Salvador, Gil-Lopez, Sergio, Molina, Daniel, Benjamins, Richard, Chatila, Raja, and Herrera, Francisco. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI." Information Fusion, 58, 82-115, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

  • Rudin, Cynthia. "Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead." Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x

  • Rudin, Cynthia, and Radin, Joanna. "Why Are We Using Black Box Models in AI When We Don’t Need To? A Lesson From An Explainable AI Competition." Harvard Data Science Review, 1(2), 2019. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.5a8a3a3d

  • Kundu, Shinjini. "AI in medicine must be explainable." Nature Medicine, 27(8), 1328, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01461-z

  • Ghassemi, Marzyeh, Oakden-Rayner, Luke, and Beam, Andrew L. "The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care." Lancet Digital Health, 3(11), e745-e750, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9

  • Tjoa, Erico, and Guan, Cuntai. "A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI." IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(11), 4793-4813, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3027314

Share on Share on Share on